Update note: The content was reviewed against the WHO page cited at the time of editing. Information on the source page may be updated over time.
What role does WHO play in international food safety standards?
When F&B businesses follow changes in food management, the common question is not only “which standards are being applied”, but also what scientific basis underpins those standards. According to WHO, the Standards and Scientific Advice on Food and Nutrition unit is the focal point for the organisation’s work on developing international standards in the fields of food safety and nutrition.
This unit provides science-based food safety risk assessments, together with evidence-based guidance on foodborne hazards, nutritional requirements and policy recommendations. For gelato and F&B businesses, this is an important perspective for understanding why international food safety standards are not merely a set of operational requirements, but are also based on the risk assessment processes of specialist bodies.
The information was cross-checked against the WHO Standards and Scientific Advice on Food and Nutrition page at the time of editing.
How do the WHO/FAO committees provide a scientific basis?
Four expert groups and their assessment scopes
WHO works with FAO to oversee a number of joint committees and expert meetings. Each group focuses on a different assessment scope, rather than addressing all food safety issues in the same way.
| Expert group | Scope stated by WHO |
|---|---|
| JECFA | Food additives |
| JMPR | Pesticide residues |
| JEMRA | Microbiological risk assessment |
| JEMNU | Nutrition |
Through the work of these groups, WHO describes the development of scientific risk assessments to determine safe exposure levels for certain chemicals and microorganisms in food, while also supporting the development of nutrition-related standards. This describes the system’s scientific role, not specific legal guidance for individual products or markets.
The scopes of JECFA, JMPR, JEMRA and JEMNU are presented in WHO’s specialist information on the WHO/FAO committees.
From risk assessment to Codex standards
The link between scientific advice and standards development
A notable point in WHO’s information is the link between scientific advice and standards development. WHO states that scientific advice from the joint WHO/FAO committees provides the basis for the Codex Alimentarius Commission to develop international standards on food safety and quality.
The same source also states that these scientific assessments and advice form the basis for food safety standards development in many Member States. In other words, Codex and national standards systems may use this scientific assessment foundation in the standards development process; this article does not equate international standards with mandatory regulations in every country.
For those looking into market news or following F&B industry news, this distinction helps avoid the assumption that scientific information from WHO automatically replaces local regulations. A business’s specific obligations must still be checked according to the relevant market, product and authoritative documents.
What should gelato and F&B businesses monitor?
People who are new to opening a shop often ask where they should start when terms relating to standards and risk assessment appear in industry news. Within the scope of the available source, the cautious answer is to start by understanding how WHO divides the expert groups and the relationship between scientific assessment, Codex and national standards development.
- Distinguish scientific sources from legal requirements: risk assessments and scientific advice provide a reference basis for standards development, but they are not compliance guidance for every establishment.
- Identify the relevant issue group: food additives, pesticide residues, microbiological hazards and nutrition are organised by WHO/FAO into different specialist scopes.
- Read news through the chain of links: when a standard is mentioned, check whether it is a Codex standard or a regulation of a specific market, rather than relying only on the WHO name.
- Ask questions relevant to business operations: businesses can continue to refer to F&B business guidance and Gelato knowledge, but should not regard this article as legal advice or a food safety procedure.
What this article cannot conclude
Limitations of the overview
The accepted source only describes WHO’s role, the joint WHO/FAO committees and the relationship between scientific advice and Codex, as well as standards development in many countries. The source does not provide a list of specific requirements for a particular gelato product, recipe, storage conditions, shelf life, limit levels for individual substances or control procedures at a shop.
Therefore, the article does not conclude that a specific product or establishment has met any particular standard. When assessing compliance, businesses should identify the relevant market and consult the appropriate official documents rather than drawing conclusions from WHO’s general information.
A market perspective for F&B professionals
WHO’s role in this system is worth following because it shows how international food safety standards are connected with scientific assessments of chemicals, microorganisms and nutrition. For the gelato and F&B community, understanding the WHO/FAO–expert committee–Codex chain can help people read market news more critically, particularly when distinguishing between the scientific basis and practical requirements.
This is guidance-oriented information based on the WHO source cited in the article and reviewed against the content currently published by WHO at the time of editing. Matters relating to specific regulations, certifications, product documentation or operational controls should be considered separately according to the relevant legal context.
References
Partner with Baby Boss
Explore products and Baby Boss services, or call 1900998880.
Shopee · TikTok · Instagram · Threads · YouTube · LinkedIn · Zalo OA · Pinterest
Comments